You cannot make an omelet without destroying a few societies

The world is now on the brink of a colossal collapse of all welfare states. This cluster of failures will include the most developed and democratic nations on the planet. There has never been a universal political and economic failure like the one ahead.

That is of no concern for leftists. Ideology is more important than results. The hardships along the way are rationalized with nonsensical tripe such as “you cannot make an omelet without breaking a few eggs.”

When times get tough, Socialists respond by demanding more from the productive. Tax coercion and/or the printing presses are their preferred methods. Either, when carried far enough, destroys economies and societies. For some Marxists, that itself is a goal as it is the necessary and inevitable end to capitalism.

More here.

About these ads
This entry was posted in Welfare states (and their coming collapse). Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to You cannot make an omelet without destroying a few societies

  1. Roberto Severino says:

    Excellent article which destroyed the socialism cult for me.

    What are your favorite, most essential economics books, especially on refuting left wing style Keynesian economics? I’ve already read many myself, but I’m always on the lookout for more books so I can have enough knowledge to destroy a leftist or a socialist in their limited, fantasy ideology. Would you also recommend reading Keynes’ General Theory to get a feel for why certain economists believe in the policies that they advocate?

    • hpx83 says:

      Reading Keynes is in my view hopeless, unless you want your brain to get entangled in nonsensical constructs (I’ve only tried reading small parts of it, and my brain just hurts). And most economists, even Keynesians, haven’t read Keynes. Better to pick up a standard macro-economic textbook and then applying austrian economic theory to it to understand how their flawed model of the world works.

      The first and best book to destroying a number of economic myhts is “Economics in one lesson” by Henry Hazlitt. After that, it sort of depends on what part of the economic spectrum you are going for – but the Mises Institute probably has every important book ever written on economics available (and lots of other things).

      • Roberto Severino says:

        Alright thanks. I got through “Economics in One Lesson” yesterday and loved it. Basically a lot of economists don’t think about what their remedies are going to do to the economy in the long run. I’ve also read Greg Mankiw’s Principles of Economics last winter for my economics class which went into basic Keynesian concepts, which I self studied in a week and took notes for and Thomas Sowell’s “Basic Economics,” which Captain Capitalism recommended to me, which brilliantly defended free market capitalism with tons of real world examples. All very helpful in gaining more economic knowledge than the average MBA holder.

        I also found a great book on Mises by Hazlitt called “The Failure of the New Economics” that tries to refute Keynes’ General Theory chapter by chapter. I’m pretty much going to try reading Keynes and have that book as a guide to understand all the economic fallacies and vague language that Keynes wrote in.

        I also don’t understand the big hype about MMT (Modern Monetary Theory), which seems to defend the whole fiat currency/central banking system that we have now. I don’t want to describe what it is because I don’t want to misrepresent their views, but here’s what I’m talking about.

        http://mises.org/community/forums/t/22477.aspx?PageIndex=1

        http://socialdemocracy21stcentury.blogspot.com/2012/12/robert-murphy-on-mmt-unimpressive.html

        Summary of how the radical left thinks:

        “No doubt additional jobs will be created in new private businesses, but it is unlikely to be enough. Free markets do not guarantee full employment, nor does Say’s law work. Employment in tradable goods and services in many countries will probably fall dramatically. Our employment future will probably be mainly in services, education, and most probably in employment programs funded by government or in government-sector jobs. There will probably be a great reduction in the hours that people need to work as well and more leisure.”

        “It might well be that much of the government-funded labour force will be in education (e.g., universities), sciences, research and development, or other services. I suspect a much greater labour force working in basic sciences and applied R&D would mean a much more rapid advancement of science and technology too – a virtuous circle.”

        I’ll give the blogger credit for citing STEM related fields as being vital, but I think once you read some of that last post, you’ll realize how dangerously utopian and unrealistic their way of thinking really is. Keep fighting the good fight in stopping the radical left and their socialism tinged nonsense from taking over.

        http://socialdemocracy21stcentury.blogspot.com/2012/12/rise-of-robots.html

  2. the beast is on the gobble
    and all that matters is we’re all headed for it’s belly

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s